#Silverfast canon scanner software how to
#Silverfast canon scanner software install
#Silverfast canon scanner software pro

It's then up to you to learn the software and how to apply it. If the neg is not so good, then the scanner can't do any better than that. The printing solution PrinTao 8 has great success in the area of Large Format Printers since 2013. If the neg is top notch, even Vuescan will produce a very good scan from it. SilverFast is the standard in the field of Scanning and Archiving Software, featuring powerful highlights like fully automatic IT8 Calibration and Multi-Exposure function (both patented). For a start, the scanner is only as good as the negative being scanned.

If other folk post pics that are sharper and have better color than your pics, they either have better equipment and/or better knowledge of the software they're using, or you are simply not post processing your pics to their standard. There's usually good reports about the Canon 9000f (I take it you meant '9000' not '900'), but determine if that is the scanner you want to continue with before buying Silverfast which will be locked into your scanner, and then have to change it for any future scanner you acquire.

But now you say you want to print 13x19, well that's a different matter altogether, Silverfast would be worthwhile in that case, but there's still a learning curve with it and also with Vuescan. I'm basically self and youtube taught, but if there's a good learning solution, or a needed equipment upgrade, I'm all for any ideas anyone has.Д¬lick to expand.No, Silverfast has a reasonable reputationД«ut for posting pics online, it's not really necessary to buy Silverfast which is a major cost. I've learned a lot over the past couple of years, but I feel I've hit a roadblock in terms of learning curve. Would pricier consumer-grade scanner really make that much of a difference? Or is it possible my Lightroom/Photoshop skills are that below par? Is there a scanner below the V800 price range that would be worth upgrading to? Or is the general consensus that Flatbeds are no longer the way to go? I am constantly on Instagram and various online publications and see other 35mm images with sharpness and color ranges much better and deeper than I've ever achieved. I think now that I'm doing mostly color 35mm film instead of black and white, Epson would have been the better brand choice. Maybe it couldn't hurt to have both? VueScan definitely has a lot of strengths, and I've gotten lots of nice images out of it, its just not consistent especially with color accuracy and range.ДЄs for my scanner, I'm reasonably happy with the resolution of many of my scans, but reading online there's a lot of debate over the actual resolution of these scanners. The time spent getting a decent looking image from which I can more easily pick my best frames and do any detail editing is a fraction of the time. I'm well aware of the cost of Silverfast vs Vuescan, as well as the company's reputation as not so consumer friendly (charging for upgrades and registering for new scanners) but I'm still thinking about making the switch. VueScan also constantly clips the blacks, and I find the interface so spartan I don't feel I have much control over what I'm doing. Either way the amount of post just to get the image to a basically satisfactory level is crazy time consuming. VueScan rarely hits the color even nearly correct, and I've resorted to either scanning the negatives in raw and manually turning each image into a positive then color correcting in Photoshop, or, if the color is at least in the ballpark for a roll, flattening the image out as much as possible in VueScan.

#Silverfast canon scanner software pro

However, its also a bit less confusing if you try to run it in 'idiot mode' without tweaking anything.I've been using a Canon 900f MKII with VueScan Pro for a while now, and while I've been reasonably happy with the results I recently tried a trial version of Silverfast SE 8 and was amazed at the differences right out of the scanner. Its UI feels even clunkier and more poorly organized, and its even worse at batch scanning. Vuescan is a lot cheaper, but also a lot more reliable as a piece of software. I just wish it had some real competition. Of course when you do figure it out, Silverfast is clearly the better program. The UI feels like a disorganized mess, and its difficult to actually figure out if you're doing things correctly. And it'll often make you restart it if anything about your scanner's state changes too much. The program won't even start unless it successfully detects your scanner, otherwise you're stuck in the launcher window.

#Silverfast canon scanner software install

Multiple installations of the software are very poorly supported, and makes you feel like something's going to break whenever you want to install updates. You can't support multiple scanners without buying multiple licenses and having multiple installations of the software I feel like some UX person needs to thwap the developers over the head. Silverfast definitely feels like a more sophisticated and featureful piece of software, but its also clunky as hell.